Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Referendum Tuesday
|
|
Posted by:
Townhall.com Staff at
6:50 PM
|
|
Kids in Virginia had the day off today due to the election and because it was parent-teacher conference day at the end of the first quarter.
Barack Obama is having a sort of first quarter review tonight. Virginia at 7pm, New Jersey at 8pm and NY23 at 9pm.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
"The problem with activists is that they’re active."
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
4:43 PM
|
I chatted with Dr. Michael Ruddy, a political science professor from SUNY-Oswego, about the NY-23 election results earlier this week. Something he said really resonated with me as it comes down to the wire in NY-23:
The problem with activists is that they’re activeand that they’re hard to control. And the National Republican Party isn’t too happy about it... The one variable in this is the voters. Hijacking of the race is what happens – independent groups come in and begin to change the campaign dynamic. On one hand, yes – it's easy to say that conservative activists came in and hijacked the race. But if when Hoffman sweeps NY-23, it will be easier to point to the failure of the mainstream Republican Party in the state and say that occasionally, a little interference by national activists can be good for the local politicos.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Knock, Knock. Virginia Voters? Anyone There?
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
4:21 PM
|
Some of the poll workers said they had seen a steady stream of voters throughout the day, but most said there weren't so many. And there certainly weren't any when I got there.
These poll workers were just left staring at each other:

These guys seemed to be having fun at the table. There were no voters at their booths behind them, though.

This was a pretty cool high school gym. But no voters:

I'll resist the urge to bloviate about what low turnout means for Virginia. But I'm sure it means one thing: most people really just don't care.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
New Poll: Health Care through Women's Eyes
|
|
Posted by:
Garrett Murch at
3:25 PM
|
A new poll released Wednesday by the Independent Women's Forum shows that only 16% of women believe that health care should be Congress's top priority and that a majority (51%) is unsatisfied with what they have read, seen, or heard about the proposals being considered today. The poll, conducted by WomanTrend, surveyed 800 women registered to vote and was conducted between October 19-25, 2009.
Key Findings:
• Government is not the solution: 61% of women think the private sector does a better job of providing choice in health care. • Change for thee, but not for me: 75% want few to no changes to their own healthcare (40% -- be modified, but mostly left as is; 35% -- be left as-is). • No egg timers: 43% of women say that Congress and the President should enact healthcare reform "only when quality legislation is developed, even if it means there is no deadline." Less than three in ten think it needs to happen by the end of the year. • Too expensive: Only 10% say that $1 trillion or more should be spent on health care reform. Most put the acceptable amounts in the thousands (16%), millions (24%), or billions (16%). • Concerns with waste: 77% say government spends money in a mostly inefficient way and 55% believe CBO projections underestimate how much will ultimately be spent on health care reform.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Who Voted and How Did Conservatives Split Their Votes: From 1980 (Reagan's first victory) to 2008 (Obama's first--and we hope last--victory)
|
|
Posted by:
Michael Medved at
3:18 PM
|
The figures gathered below contain several crucial revelations:
1- Republicans always win big majorities of self-described conservatives--even losing Republicans like Dole and McCain.
2- The ONLY Republicans who win are those who manage to split moderate voters. For instance, Ronald Reagan got 54% of the moderate vote in 1984 and earned a 49 state landslide. Meanwhile, even those Republican nominees who win big among "conservatives" don't necessarily win elections. McCain did better among self-described conservatives in 2008 (78%) than Reagan did in 1980 (73%), but he still lost the election. In fact, McCain beat Obama by 58 points among conservatives, but lost among moderates by 21 points, and so lost the election.
(See graphic after the jump)
Read More...
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
AIM: Rev. Wright Calls America, "land of the greed and home of the slave."
|
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
2:40 PM
|
Accuracy in Media's (AIM) Cliff Kincaid has uncovered a new video of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, which shows him,
... praising Marxism and discussing his ties to communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua and the Libyan government. Equally important, Wright is being introduced in the video by Robert W. McChesney, co-founder of Free Press, an organization which has come under scrutiny for its links to the Obama Administration and dedication to the transformation and control of the private media in the U.S. More Kincaid on Wright's comments ...
He called America "land of the greed and home of the slave."
Read the whole thing here. Also please note this:
*Editor's Note: The Wright video linked to in Cliff Kincaid's column, Controversial New Video of Obama's Pastor, has been deleted. But the same video can still be viewed on YouTube in three parts. Here are part one, part two, and part three. We do not know why the original video was taken down, but have our suspicions.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Campaign Doldrums
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
2:25 PM
|
More from the ground in the Commonwealth, this time farther west in Loudoun County:
The polls were nearly empty at 1:30 pm. A couple of supporters from each side of the aisle were standing the requisite distance away from the polling center, but no other campaign volunteers were in sight. Not surprisingly, there was a much lower level of energy than last November, both at the polling center and in the general community.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
New CIA Docs Show Detainee Interrogation Yielded HALF of All Al-Qaeda Intel
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
2:19 PM
|
Through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Judicial Watch has obtained documents from the CIA, including reports that claim detainee reporting was "pivotal" for the war against al-Qaeda:
These new reports, dated June 1, 2005 and July 12, 2005, contain some different information than the previously released report, dated June 3, 2005. Notably, the June 1, 2005 report concludes that "Detainee reporting accounts for more than half of all HUMINT reporting on al-Qa'ida since the program began..." This fact is missing from the other two later reports. The June 1, 2005 report also has additional pages of redacted material. All three reports conclude: "One of the gains to detaining the additional terrorists has been the thwarting of a number of al-Qa'ida operations in the United States and overseas." (The previously released June 3, 2005 report notes "...detainees in mid-2003 helped us build a list of approximately 70 individuals – many of whom we had never heard of before – that al-Qa'ida deemed suitable for Western operations.") ...
In March, President Obama overruled objections from national security officials and released documents detailing the government's enhanced interrogation program of terrorists (the so-called "torture" memos). However, President Obama initially withheld information detailing the results of this program, including alleged terrorist plots that the program prevented. "All of these CIA documents come to the same conclusion: Detainee interrogations are effective and have helped save lives in the United States and overseas," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "The Obama administration initially attempted to conceal the effectiveness of detainee interrogations by cherry picking documents to support its view on the interrogation program. We're pleased we have been able to provide the American people with more of the truth about the effectiveness of terrorist detainee interrogations."
Major HTs: Judicial Watch, Keep America Safe
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Why Do We Vote on Tuesday?
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
2:08 PM
|
Why Tuesday?
In 1845, before Florida, California, and Texas were states or slavery had been abolished, Congress needed to pick a time for Americans to vote. We were an agrarian society. We traveled by horse and buggy. Farmers needed a day to get to the county seat, a day to vote, and a day to get back, without interfering with the three days of worship. So that left Tuesday and Wednesday, but Wednesday was market day. So, Tuesday it was. In 1875 Congress extended the Tuesday date for national House elections and in 1914 for federal Senate elections.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Energy: A Top Priority for Obama, But Not for Voters
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
2:00 PM
|
The White House homepage today highlights the Obama administration's dedication to "lead the global economy in clean energy." Congress is eagerly awaiting the end of the health care debate so it can take up the Democrats' cap-and-trade plan. But the latest word from the American people is that energy policy is dead last on their priority list these days.
A recent poll from USA Today shows that even when Barack Obama was elected president last November, only 6% of Americans thought energy should be his top priority. Now, a year later, even fewer think this policy warrents the White House's full attention. Only 2% of Americans now think the President's top priority should be energy, well-behind other top concerns like the economy, Iraq and Afghanistan, health care and the federal budget deficit.
With this insight, why is the Obama administration continuing to pursue its cap-and-trade policy as if it were a top priority? And since the nation's economy and budget deficits are so high on Americans' priority lists, why would the administration pursue cap-and-trade knowing that it would have significant negative impacts on business' bottom lines, homeowners' pocketbooks and the nation's economy as a whole?
PS--Why is the White House website reporting that the stimulus plan has "created or saved" jobs for "over one million people" when its own Recovery.gov is only reporting 640,000?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 12 Minutes 14 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 17 Minutes 22 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 19 Minutes 58 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 21 Minutes 20 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 36 Minutes 45 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Comments Comments
•Axeman
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
NOTW
•NeoZionistTool
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
Careful with that axe, Eugene
•David
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
Careful with that axe, Eugene
•Nancy"face of pure evil" Pelosi,,,,,
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
colt.45
•A final thought
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
David
•More lies
Re:
CBO: PelosiCare Cost Estimate = $3 Trillion Over 10 Years
By
Patrice
•Crosseyed
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Careful with that axe, Eugene
•NeoZionistTool
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Careful with that axe, Eugene
•Here's anuddun
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
David
•Teabagger
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Careful with that axe, Eugene
•NeoConScum and dreadnaught
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
David
•Yeah trolls
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
Tea Party
•"axe up his butt"
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
cottoneyed
•TeaParty...
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
NeoConScum
•I guess it does take an
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
cottoneyed
•Saw one of CAIR's
Re:
Just Vote No
By
Tea Party
•Shut YOUR stupid yap
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Tea Party
•Hey Boyd(D) Fl
Re:
Health Care Vote Looms: Where Does Your Rep. Stand?
By
Donnie
•NOTW,
Re:
The Undecideds
By
cottoneyed
•Crawfish: You are quite right
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
K.G.
|
|
|
|
The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|