NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Austin Hill :: Townhall.com Columnist
Marxism, American Christians, And Election 2008
by Austin Hill
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you believe that the US needs President Bush's proposed 700-billion-dollar financial bailout plan?

Barack Obama has a controversial relationship with a Pastor.

I am not here referring to Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Obama has fallen under harsh scrutiny because of the actions of his own Pastor, and this has become quite widely known within the last week.

But Mr. Obama has also had at least some sort of “connection” with a Pastor of a different church, and the very fact that this “connection” exists has implications for the next election.

Pastor Rick Warren heads up the popular “Saddleback Church” in suburban Orange County, California (it’s name comes from the nearby Saddleback Mountain range). A trend setting institution within the Evangelical “mega church” movement, the congregation makes up the largest church in California, and the fourth largest church in the United States.

Yet Pastor Warren’s influence reaches far beyond his own, local pulpit. Widely known for publishing “The Purpose Driven Life” book earlier this decade (a New York Times’ bestseller), Warren’s pastoral advice has impacted untold numbers worldwide. And Warren’s influence among Evangelical clergy has been steadily building for at least the past two decades, reaching a high point with the publishing of “The Purpose Driven Church” book back in the mid-90’s.

To his credit, Warren has tried to compel Evangelicals (and thoughtful Christians of all sorts) to engage on a wider array of social and cultural concerns - - caring for the poor, fighting disease in the third world, and, yes, a proper care of the environment. In so doing, Warren has expanded upon the accomplishments of the older Evangelical activists who have over the past three decades narrowly defined their efforts as comprising the “pro-family movement” - - a movement dedicated to protecting the life of the unborn child, and the historic definition of marriage.

And this is where Obama comes in. In November and December of 2006, Saddleback Church hosted the 2nd annual “Global Summit On AIDS and the Church,” and Senator Obama, along with Senator Sam Brownback, were two of the more high-profile speakers at the event. At the time, Warren was harshly criticized by other Evangelical leaders for having invited the staunchly pro-abortion Obama. Warren’s response? "Jesus loved and accepted others without approving of everything they did” he told his detractors. “That's our position too, but it upsets a lot of people, so we get attacked from both sides."

The Evangelical reaction to Obama was predictable, and Warren’s pursuit of “unity” and “bi-partisanship” was commendable. But if Obama’s stance on abortion is troublesome for Evangelicals, why wouldn’t his stance on a variety of other policy issues - - and in particular, economic issues - - be equally as troubling? Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Austin Hill is a Talk Show Host for the Fox Newstalk Radio Network, and a frequent guest host for 630 WMAL / Washington D.C. and 1080 KRLD/Dallas. He is the author of "White House Confidential: The Little Book Of Weird Presidential History," and is a local columnist for Arizona's East Valley Tribune Newspaper.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: what a silly article
As if the Church hasn't been engaged in caring for the poor, fighting disease, etc. ! What Warren is trying to do is facilitate the Church handing over what remains of these long time features of "practical" Christianity to the government. The church has been doing this privately directly or through para-church and other nonprofits. It is noteworthy that even Hill recognizes that the older Evangelical activists have narrowly defined their POLITICAL efforts to abortion and marriage. So much for designs on a theocracy as liberals often accuse. But what Hill seems to miss is that so much of what the Church is about is our own personal behavior, our own personal responsibilities. Any collectivism is focuses on the Church. Any activity engaged in Christ's name is by the Church. The Church knows that it is on shaky ground when it starts making policy statements as the Church on economics or foreign affairs or any other area on which the Bible is not specific.

So he snidely laments that we "have virtually nothing to say about the virtues of wealth creation, and the kind of economic environment that fosters prosperity." And he says "This ambivalence towards economic paradigms - - which is at its core a failure to adequately understand economics as a “moral issue”..." So his deep economic insights into the fundamental morality of economics? "...It is okay for individuals to create wealth for themselves and their families; and that private citizens should care for the needy of society, rather than abdicating this responsibility..." Give me a break! Write a column when you have something to teach us.

Here a program Marx would hate
http://www.heifer.org/
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2: