NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Carrie Schwab Pomerantz :: Townhall.com Columnist
When to Take Social Security: Think Before You Leap
by Carrie Schwab Pomerantz
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
I think my taxes would go up if this person were elected President:


You probably read it in the paper or heard it on the news - the first American baby boomer applied for Social Security last fall; some have said it is the start of the "silver tsunami." The baby boomer generation, over 75 million strong, is now lining up to collect their Social Security benefits.

My friend's husband was at the head of the line. He decided to bet on a sure thing and take the cash as soon as he turned 62. And he's not alone in his decision. According to an OASDI study released late last year, 76 percent of women and 71 percent of men took early Social Security. But is that the wisest decision?

It's an important question, since what you decide now will affect how much you can collect in benefits for the rest of your life. Before you start counting that added boost to your income, I recommend you carefully look at the facts and calculate the pluses and minuses in light of your own situation.

YOUR BASIC CHOICES

You have three choices for when to take Social Security:

- Take it as early as age 62

- Wait until what the IRS designates as your "normal retirement age" (between 65 and 67, depending on when you were born)

- Or wait as late as age 70

Take Social Security at your normal retirement age and it's simple enough. But collect it early or late, and things become a bit more complicated due to a penalty if you start too early.

If you begin using benefits before your normal retirement age, your monthly check will decrease by as much as 25 percent, and that reduction is permanent. The plus side, of course, is that you'll receive checks for a longer period of time.

Also, if you collect Social Security before your retirement age and you're still working, your benefits will be reduced $1 for every $2 you earn above the annual limit ($13,560 for 2008) - another important consideration. In the year you reach your normal retirement age, it changes to $1 in benefits deducted for each $3 you earn above a higher limit ($36,120 in 2008). Once you hit the appropriate age, your earnings won't impact the size of your benefit.

YOU GET A CREDIT IF YOU DELAY

If you postpone taking Social Security, your benefits go up by 8 percent for every year you delay until age 70. You'll receive bigger checks, but for a shorter period of time. Past age 70, there's no added advantage to waiting.

The actual dollar amount you receive depends on how much you've earned during your working years. Your annual Social Security statement lists your projected benefits at age 62, your normal retirement age, and at age 70. If you need a copy, you can request one at ssa.gov, which is a great resource for all kinds of information.

IS IT WORTH THE WAIT?

This is where it can get complicated; it really depends on how long you live. The longer you live, the smarter it may be to delay taking benefits. You'll receive fewer monthly checks over your lifetime, but the payments will be larger. A longer life span gives more time for those larger checks to make up for the payments you missed by postponing your benefits. But since you can't predict the future, how do you decide?

You may have heard the term "break-even age." This is how long you need to live to make sure choosing a later benefit date will give you greater lifetime benefits. The "break-even age" depends on the amount of your benefits as well as the assumptions you use to factor in taxes, inflation, and what you might gain by investing your early benefits.

Let's say you're a top wage earner who's turning 62 this year, and your monthly benefits at ages 62, 66 and 70 are $1,647, $2,233 and $3,019 respectively. Your break-even ages would be as follows:

- Take Social Security at age 62 versus 66 and your break-even age is 77.

- Collect it at 62 versus 70 and your break-even age is 79 and 6 months. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

As chief strategist/consumer education for Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Schwab Pomerantz is a leading advocate for individual investors. She speaks and writes extensively about personal finance issues and is a driving force in the movement to improve financial literacy in America. As president of the Charles Schwab Foundation, she also oversees the company’s philanthropic strategy and resources.

Subject: Look at the bottom line - after taxes
I think it is a mistake for people to analyze their social security options based on what they guess will be their life expectancy. If they die sooner than that, so what? The more important considerations are 1) what will be your net after tax benefits and 2) do you need the extra money now? Unless necessitated by health and/or financial problems, taking early Social Security benefits can be a very short sighted decision.

Easy choice
1. Inflation is at least three times more than the government reports, so social security will pay for less each year.

2. My income is only 20% of what it used to be. No reasonable life available without increase in debt. Nor can I live with Social security alone.

So I begin collecting at 62.5, and retirement never possible.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!