NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Friday, April 11, 2008
Charles Krauthammer :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Advancing Iranian Nuclear Program
by Charles Krauthammer
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How do you feel about John McCain's selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate?


WASHINGTON -- On Tuesday, Iran announced it was installing 6,000 more centrifuges -- they produce enriched uranium, the key ingredient of a nuclear weapon -- in addition to the 3,000 already operating. The world yawned.

It is time to admit the truth: The Bush administration's attempt to halt Iran's nuclear program has failed. Utterly. The latest round of U.N. Security Council sanctions, which took a year to achieve, is comically weak. It represents the end of the sanctions road.

The president is going to hand over to his successor an Iran on the verge of going nuclear. This will deeply destabilize the Middle East, threaten the moderate Arabs with Iranian hegemony and leave Israel on hair-trigger alert.

This failure can, however, be mitigated. Since there will apparently be no disarming of Iran by pre-emption or by sanctions, we shall have to rely on deterrence to prevent the mullahs, some of whom are apocalyptic and messianic, from using nuclear weapons.

During the Cold War, we prevented an attack not only on the U.S. but also on America's allies by extending the American nuclear umbrella -- i.e., declaring that any attack on our allies would be considered an attack on the United States.

Such a threat is never 100 percent credible. Nonetheless, it made the Soviets think twice about attacking our European allies. It kept the peace.

We should do the same to keep nuclear peace in the Middle East. It would be infinitely less dangerous (and therefore more credible) than Cold War deterrence because there will be no threat from Iran of the annihilation of the United States. Iran, unlike the Soviet Union, would have a relatively tiny arsenal incapable of reaching the U.S.

How to create deterrence? The way John Kennedy did during the Cuban missile crisis. President Bush should issue the following declaration, adopting Kennedy's language while changing the names of the miscreants:

It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear attack upon Israel by Iran, or originating in Iran, as an attack by Iran on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon Iran.

This should be followed with a simple explanation: "As a beacon of tolerance and as leader of the free world, the United States will not permit a second Holocaust to be perpetrated upon the Jewish people." Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Charles Krauthammer is a 1987 Pulitzer Prize winner, 1984 National Magazine Award winner, and a columnist for The Washington Post since 1985.

Be the first to read Charles Krauthammer's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Subject: Correction to prior blog...
MN Mary is understandably concerned about the disturbing implications to our preemptive invasion of Iraq. The President, in concert with a cabal of neoconservatives, initiated the Iraq conflict based on faulty intelligence, and the rationale for war--which Mary calls "dubious"--has continued to evolve. But overshadowing the Iraq debacle are the frightening prospects of war between the US and Iran.

Two months ago, Mike McConnell, Director of National Intelligence, released a National Intelligence Estimate indicating that Iran discontinued its nuke program. Since then, McConnell has retreated from that position, and the US has moved inexorably closer to preemptive action against Iran.

Intelligence analysts have widely confirmed that Iran is pursuing enrichment of U-235, and developing longer-range Shehab missles (two out of three components of an offensive nuclear strategy). Iran was judged to have terminated the third leg, a warhead design program (or certain aspects of it), which it can either resurrect or may not longer require if engineers already have a workable design in their possession.

We will soon reach a point where the West must disable Iran's nuclear program if the Iranians genuinely pose an unacceptable threat. The poignant question of the hour is whether we should be more afraid of President Bush or the Ayatollahs.

God bless you MN Mary...
MN Mary is undestandably concerned about the disturbing implications to our preemtive invasion of Iraq. The President,in concert with a cabal of neoconservatives, initiated the Iraq conflict based on faulty intellience, and the rationale for war--which Mary calls "dubious"--has continued to evolve. But overshadowing the Iraq debacle are the frightening prospects of war between the US and Iran.

Two months ago, Mike McConnell, Director of National Intelligence, released a National Intelligence Estimate indicating that Iran discontinued its nuke program. Since then, McConnell has retreated from that position, and the US has moved inexorably closer to preemtive action against Iran.

Intelligence analysts have widely confirmed that Iran is pursuing enrichment of U-235, and developing longer-range Shehab missles (two out of three components of an offensive nuclear strategy). Iran was judged to have terminated the third leg, a warhead design program (or certain aspects of it), which it can either resurrect or may not longer require if engineers already have a workable design in their possession.

We will soon reach a point where the West must disable Iran's nuclear program if Iran genuinely poses an unacceptable threat. The poignant question of the hour is whether we should more afraid of President Bush or the Ayatollahs.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name: